Report an error   


Submitted: 09 June 2010 Modified: 22 March 2016
HERDIN Record #: PCHRD06081003062076

Cervical total disc replacement surgery motion preservation surgery with artificial disc (prestige LP): An alternative to fusion surgery in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.

Ibet Marie Y. Sih

See More

Cervical degenerative disc disease may be alleviated by decompressive surgery with discectomy and fusion, with or without plating. Drawbacks to fusion include decreased range of motion of the cervical spine, adjacent disc degeneration due to uneven loading and possible subsequent surgery of the adjacent levels. Motion preservation surgery with artificial disc after descectomy decreases the risk of adjacent level disease and offers the advantage of no morbidities from donor site (iliac bone graft) and non-need for post-operative immobilization with cervical collar.


OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the results of motion preservation surgery with artificial disc as compared to fusion surgery in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.


METHODS: This study is a review of patients with cervical degenerative disc disease who underwent decompressive surgery. Comparison was made among those who underwent motion preservation surgery with Prestige LP (Group A) and those who underwent fusion surgery with plating (Group B) and without plating (Group C).


RESULTS: Majority of the patients underwent one to two level surgeries: 100% in Group A, 95.8% in Group B and 86.7% in Group C. Operative time and blood loss were similar among the three groups. Improvement after surgeries, based on the Nurick scale, were also comparable. Improvement of neurological status was noted in 85.7% (Group A), 100% (Group B) and 73.3% (Group C).

Publication Type
Journal
Publication Sub Type
Journal Article, Original
Title
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties
Frequency
Quarterly
Publication Date
October-December 2009
Volume
64
Issue
4
Page(s)
151-156
LocationLocation CodeAvailable FormatAvailability
Philippine Council for Health Research and Development Library Box No.6 Fulltext Print Format (Request Document)
1. Pickett, GE , et al., . "Controversies in cervical discectomy and fusion: practice patterns among Canadian surgeons" Can J Neurol Sci 31, 478-483, 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15595251
2. Pospiech, J , et al., . "Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine" Neurosurgery 44, 379-384, 1999. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9932892
3. Eck, JC , et al., . "Biochemical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent- level intradescal pressure and segmental motion" Spine 27, 2431-2434, 2002
4. Hilibrand, AS , et al., . "Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis" J Bone Joint Surg Am 81, 519-528, 1999. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10225797
5. Sekhon, LH , Ball, JR . "Artificial cervical disc replacement: principles, types and techniques" Neurol India 53, 445-450, 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16565536
6. Phillips, FM , et al., . "Anterior cervical pseudarthrosis. Natural history and treatment" Spine 22, 1585-1589, 1997. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9253093
7. Vacarro, AR , et al., . "Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery" Spine J 2, 206-215, 2002. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14589495
8. Fernstrom, U . "Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprethesis in herniated disc and in painful disc" Acta Chir scand Suppl 357, 154-159, 1966
9. Cummins, BH , et al., . "Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint" J Neurosurg 88, 943-948, 1998. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9609285
10. Wigfield, CC , et al., . "The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: a results from two-year pilot study" Spine 27, 2446-2452, 2002. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12435973
11. Traynelis, VC . "The prestige cervical disc replacement" Spine J 4, 310-314, 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15541682
12. Sasso, RC , et al., . "Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective randomized study with 2 year follow-up on 99 patients" Spine 32, 2933-2940, 2007. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18091483
13. Goffin, J , et al., . "Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis" Neurosurgery 51, 840-845, 2002. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12188968
14. Goffin, J , et al., . "Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with Bryan cervical prosthesis: single-level and bi-level" Spine 28, 2673-2678, 2003. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14673368
15. Sekhon, LH . "Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy" J Spinal Discord Tech 16, 307-313, 2003. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12902945
16. Sekhon, LH . "Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients" J Neurosurg Spine 3, 335-341, 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16302626
17. Pimenta, L , et al., . "Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc." Spine J 4, 315-321, 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15541683
18. Mummaneni, PV , et al., . "Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial" J Neurosurg Spine 6, 198-209, 2007. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17355018
19. Coric, D , et al., . "Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan cervical disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site" J Neurosurg Spine 4, 31-35, 2006. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16506463